Reviewers Flag High Rates of LLM-Generated Slop and Fabricated Citations in Top Venues
July 30, 2026
A review of 22 submissions across NeurIPS, WACV, and TerraBytes found that 68% contained fabricated citations, fake author lists, or hallucinated technical jargon. The audit revealed that up to 82% of specific track assignments at certain venues contained unmistakable LLM-generated content or nonsensical writing.
HOW THIS AFFECTS YOU
●
researcherYou should be increasingly cautious about the reliability of literature reviews and citations in recent preprints.
●
policyThis highlights the urgent need for better verification protocols in academic peer review processes.