MAD Bench Quantifies Influence and Decision Shifts in Multi-Agent Debates
October 28, 2026
MAD Bench evaluates how peer communication affects LLM decisions across 2,400 questions. Experiments on Qwen3.5-9B show that forced-choice readouts before rationale generation match eventual answers 65.4% of the time in debates compared to 22.3% in reflection, highlighting how social influence impacts model reasoning.
HOW THIS AFFECTS YOU
●
researcherYou can use this benchmark to study how multi-agent interactions cause models to abandon independent reasoning.
●
policyThis reveals how peer communication can manipulate model alignment and safety refusals.