CEMIR vs. FISER: a comparative study of reasoning-based and enrichment-based approaches to pragmatic intent recognition

CEMIR vs. FISER: a comparative study of reasoning-based and enrichment-based approaches to pragmatic intent recognition Source: arxiv FISER utilizes structured social and embodied reasoning to resolve intent ambiguity, whereas CEMIR employs multimodal enrichment via synthesized narratives and photorealistic images. Benchmarking across models from Qwen2.5-Omni-3B to GPT-5 on the HandMeT dataset shows that reasoning-based methods outperform enrichment-based approaches when ambiguity stems from unstated human goals rather than missing scene data.