Difference-Making without Making a Difference

Andreas & Günther's seven-paper series on actual causation collapses under internal contradiction: their latest factual difference-making definition simultaneously satisfies their own criteria for all three supposedly distinct account types — factual difference-making, counterfactual difference-making, and regularity-based. Testing all seven definitions against shared examples reveals consistent failures. For practitioners building causal inference systems, this matters because it undermines a prominent formal framework for actual causation.